MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Field trials of a new physiological data logger in active fishes

2008· article· en· W2279622435 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas D. Clark, Peter B. Frappell, Brian Taylor, Anthony P. Farrell, Scott G. Hinch, Roger S. Seymour

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThunnusSpawn (biology)FisheryAnimal scienceBiologyTunaData loggerOncorhynchusFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have designed and constructed implantable data loggers that measure heart rate (HR) and body temperature of free‐ranging animals. We present data from the first field trials of these loggers in penned southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) under aquacultural conditions, and in spawning sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) under natural conditions. Bluefin tuna (~ 15.2kg) maintained visceral temperature (VT) between 0.4 – 2.6°C above ambient water temperature (18.5°C) during non‐digesting periods, while HR ranged from 33 – 74 beats/min. VT rose to 1.4 – 6.5°C above ambient at the peak of the digestive period, and the magnitude of this increase was dependent on ration size. HR followed a similar trend during the digestive period, reaching levels of 52 – 117 beats/min and implying that the postprandial increase in oxygen consumption is assisted largely by an increase in HR. The duration of digestion ranged from 10.7 to 30.9 h depending on ration size. Sockeye salmon were implanted with data loggers in October 2007 when they had migrated from the ocean to their natal stream to spawn and subsequently die. Data analyses are ongoing, but it has been confirmed that salmon carrying data loggers do not have a reduced lifetime on the spawning ground, implanted salmon display normal courting and mating behaviours, and implanted salmon completed their lifecycle normally by spawning before death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→