Poly(<i>N</i>‐isopropylacrylamid)‐Phasendiagramme: 50 Jahre Forschung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Im Jahr 1968 publizierten Heskins und Guillet die erste systematische Studie über das Phasendiagramm von Poly( N ‐isopropylacrylamid) (PNIPAM), einem zu jener Zeit “jungen Polymer”, das erstmalig 1956 synthetisiert worden war. Seitdem ist PNIPAM zu einem führenden Vertreter der wachsenden Familie temperatur‐ und reizempfindlicher Polymere geworden. Seine thermische Antwort ist fraglos durch sein Phasenverhalten begründet. Nach nunmehr 50 Jahren Forschung zeichnet sich noch immer kein einheitliches, quantitatives Bild seines Verhaltens ab. In diesem Aufsatz treten wir eine Reise zu den beobachteten Phasendiagrammen an. Wir kommentieren theoretische Überlegungen zu den möglichen Ursachen der dabei offensichtlich werdenden Unterschiede. Dabei ist es unser Ziel, nach wie vor offene Fragen auf diesem altehrwürdigen Gebiet vor Augen zu führen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".