MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2279719152

Ensuring Reliable Medical Isotope Supply

2006· article· en· W2279719152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
KILLINGWORTH HEDGES, G Malkoske

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Basin Nuclear Conference 2006 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceBusinessEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the role of MDS Nordion and AECL in ensuring a reliable global supply of medical isotopes. The first part of the paper discusses the uses of medical isotopes, their importance to the medical community, and the benefits to patients of a secure supply of medical isotopes. The second part describes the role of the NRU reactor and the future role of the MAPLE reactors and New Processing Facility being commissioned at AECL's Chalk River Laboratories for production of medical isotopes to meet the world market demand for for the next 40 years. MDS Nordion is the world's leading supplier of medical isotopes. These isotopes are used to conduct some 34,000 nuclear medicine procedures performed every day around the world, such as determining the severity of heart disease, the spread of cancer, and diagnosing brain disorders. These medical isotopes are currently produced primarily by AECL in the NRU reactor at Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific Basin Nuclear Conference 2006Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207