MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2279832007 · doi:10.1002/mren.201500053

A Comprehensive Review on Controlled Synthesis of Long-Chain Branched Polyolefins: Part 1, Single Catalyst Systems

2016· review· en· W2279832007 on OpenAlexafffund
Pingwei Liu, Weifeng Liu, Wenjun Wang, Bo‐Geng Li, Shiping Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolymer scienceChain (unit)CatalysisPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceChemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyolefins (POs) are the largest polymer product in the world. The innovation in converting commodity olefin monomers to highly value added high-performance POs has been and will continue to be a major theme in both academic research and industry practice. The excellent properties of POs can be achieved through precise engineering of their chain architectures, which largely involves control of the chain branching structures. Long-chain branching is one of the most important parameters in the aspect of various chain branching structures. A huge amount of literatures have been reported to achieve better control of long-chain branched structures over the last two decades. Recently, good effort has been made in reviewing all the major literatures and summarizing the catalytic systems and synthetic strategies for the controlled synthesis of long-chain branched POs. This paper represents the first of the series, that is, controlled synthesis of long-chain branched POs via single catalyst systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Reaction EngineeringSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207