MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The promoter for the long isoform of mouse NKG2D is a B1 retrotransposon with a functional GABP site (136.24)

2009· article· en· W2279991979 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benjamin Chiehmin Lai, Ying Zhang, Sally Rogers, Dixie L. Mager

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNKG2DGene isoformPromoterBiologyAlternative splicingMolecular biologyRetrotransposonTransgeneGeneGeneticsGene expressionCytotoxic T cellIn vitroGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mouse gene for the natural killer (NK) cell activating receptor NKG2D produces two protein isoforms, NKG2D-S and NKG2D-L, which differ by 13 amino acids at the N-terminus and have different signaling capabilities. These two isoforms are produced through the use of alternative promoters but the regulation of these promoters has not been investigated. In this study, we show that rat NKG2D has the same splicing pattern as that of the mouse and we mapped transcriptional start sites in both species. We also show that the NKG2D-L specific promoter, active in both resting and stimulated NK cells, is derived from a rodent B1 retrotransposon that inserted before mouse-rat divergence. This B1 insertion is associated with loss of a nearby splice acceptor site that subsequently allowed creation of the short NKG2D isoform found in mouse but not human. Reporter assays suggest that the B1 promoter has no inherent lymphoid tissue-specificity. Finally, we have identified different binding sites for the ETS family member GABP within both the mouse and rat B1 elements that are necessary for high promoter activity. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Cancer Research Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→