MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280016592 · doi:10.2138/am-2004-0127

Shirozulite, KMn <sup>2+</sup> <sub>3</sub> (Si <sub>3</sub> Al)O <sub>10</sub> (OH) <sub>2</sub> , a new manganese-dominant trioctahedral mica: Description and crystal structure

2004· article· en· W2280016592 on OpenAlexaff
Kiyotaka Ishida, F. C. Hawthorne, Fumitoshi Hirowatari

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyPleochroismMonoclinic crystal systemMicaCrystal structureMetamorphismBond lengthManganeseChemistryMaterials scienceMineralMineralogyGeologyGeochemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shirozulite is a new Mn-dominant trioctahedral mica from the Taguchi mine, Aichi Prefecture, Japan. The mineral occurs in tephroite-rhodochrosite ores in contact with a Ba-bearing, K-feldspar vein. Shirozulite formed during regional low-P/T metamorphism and, thereafter, suffered thermal metamorphism from a local granodiorite. Grains of shirozulite are up to 0.5 mm across and have a typical micaceous habit. Color: dark reddish brown. Cleavage: (001), perfect. Optical properties: biaxial negative, 2V x = very small. Strongly pleochroic: X = pale yellow, Y = Z = pale brown, absorption X < Y ≈ Z. Refractive indices: n α = 1.592(2), n β ≈ n γ = 1.635(2). The structural formula is (K 0.90 Ba 0.09 ) (Mn 2+ 1.53Mg 0.94 Fe 2+ 0.20 Ti 0.04 Al 0.29 ) (Si 2.54 Al 1.46 ) O 10 [(OH) 1.97 F 0.03 ], and the end-member composition is KMn 2+ 3 AlSi 3 O 10 (OH) 2 . Density: obs. = 3.20(3) g/cm 3 by pycnometer, calc. = 3.14(2) g/cm 3 . Shirozulite is monoclinic, C2/m, 1M polytype, a = 5.3791(7), b = 9.319(1), c = 10.2918(9) Å, β = 100.186(9)°, V = 507.8(1) Å 3 . The six strongest lines in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern are as follows: d (Å), l (%), (hkl): 10.16, 100, (001); 2.654, 96, (1̅31); 3.386, 51, (003); 1.556, 48, (3̅̅13); 2.467, 46, (1̅32); 2.202, 36, (1̅33). The crystal structure has been refined to an R value of 4.1% based on 663 observed reflections collected with MoKα X-radiation from a single crystal. The mean bond lengths, tetrahedral rotation, and octahedral flattening angles are as follows: = 1.668, = 2.118, = 2.103, (inner) = 2.995, and (outer) = 3.376 Å, α = 8.36°, ψ M1 = 58.5°, ψ M2 = 58.2°. The apparent element distribution coefficient analyses among coexisting manganese or manganoan silicate minerals indicate that the trioctahedral mica structure cannot contain larger amounts of Mn 2+ relative to Mg and Fe 2+ than in olivine, pyroxenoid, and garnet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207