Understanding the Shape Memory Behavior of Self‐Bending Materials and Their Use as Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By depositing layers composed of poly ( N ‐isopropylacrylamide)‐based microgels and the polyelectrolyte polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride on a flexible substrate, responsive materials that bend upon drying can be fabricated; the extent of the bending depends on atmospheric humidity. This study shows that the bending conformation/direction can be templated, and exhibits shape memory. Detailed examination of the bilayer system leads to an understanding of the phenomena leading to this behavior. By close examination of microscopy images and diffraction patterns, this study is able to determine that the dried polymer‐based layer is composed of both amorphous and crystalline phases; the amorphous phase can readily absorb water, which results in actuation, while the crystalline phases template the bending characteristics of the device. With an understanding of the bending behavior of the devices, this study is able to generate humidity sensors by interfacing them with stretchable strain sensors, which are also developed specifically for the bendable materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".