MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280243101 · doi:10.33233/fb.v7i1.1857

Risco de trombose venosa profunda em pacientes traumato–ortopédicos hospitalizados

2018· article· pt· W2280243101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisioterapia Brasil · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian University Music Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A trombose venosa profunda (TVP) é um transtorno comum em pacientes hospitalizados, principalmente naqueles em fase pós-operatória, restritos ao leito e imobilizados. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar e classificar o risco para desenvolvimento de TVP nos pacientes internados na enfermaria de traumato-ortopedia do Hospital Estadual Rocha Faria (HERF) - Rio de Janeiro. Foi utilizado o delineamento de estudo epidemiológico descritivo, prospectivo, aleatório, de prevalência, por um perí­odo de quatro meses (maio/2003 a agosto/2003). A coleta de dados baseou-se no protocolo de profilaxia de TVP modificado. A amostra foi composta por 96 pacientes, 53 do sexo feminino e 43 do sexo masculino masculino, com idade variando de 04 a 97 anos; (média de 54,4 ± 24,1; p <0,05). Dos 96 pacientes, 8 (8%) foram classificados no risco baixo, 44 (46%) no risco médio e 44 (46%) no risco alto para desenvolvimento de TVP. Identificou-se alta prevalência (92%) para o risco de desenvolvimento de TVP na amostra estudada.Palavras-chave: trombose venosa profunda, prevalência, pacientes hospitalizados, traumato-ortopedia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it