MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280296447 · doi:10.14288/1.0102124

Tools in the carpenter's shop: a study of faulkner's use of the christian myth

2011· article· en· W2280296447 on OpenAlexaff
James Evans

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyPhilosophyHistoryArtArt historyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis describes the consistent thematic use of and the steady artistic development in the Christian myth as it appears in William Faulkner's novels. Although I concentrate on the use of Biblical allusions, other mythical references are examined when they become a part of the pattern described, as in Soldier's Pay and The Sound and the Fury. A Fable is examined first because its explicit allegorical use of the myth clearly indicates the direction Faulkner takes in the earlier stages of his artistry. It presents the fundamental conflict between "Authority," which would shape man in its own image, and the corporal-Christ's belief in the primacy of the whole being unconstrained by ideology. Such belief is "capable of containing all of time and all of man” in one unutterable vision. In order to emphasize Faulkner's development toward this articulation of the-myth, I analyze his "apprentice works," Soldier's Pay, Mosquitoes, and Sartoris, and then the later novels in which the myth is a primary element, The Sound and the Fury and Light in August. Each of these novels rejections institutions which repress man's self-expression and contains a movement toward the "timeless moment" of a vision of the essential wholeness of life. In Soldier's Pay that moment occurs amidst the sterility and fragmentation that society has instilled into Donald Mahon. At the end of the novel, the Negro church service overwhelms Joe Gilligan and Rector Mahon with its effusion of a perfect conjunction of life's elements, "sweat,...sex and death and damnation," and it enables them to experience their own profound humanity. Mosquitoes juxtaposes the superficiality and impotence aboard the Nausikaa with Fairchild's comprehension of the same primary unity of "the hackneyed accidents which make up this world." Sartoris portrays Bayard's rejection of life because of his inability to fuse his family tra- dition with the meaninglessness of his own war experiences. Then, foreshadowing the rebirth motif in Light in August, Bayard dies on the day his son is born; but his wife rejects the Sartoris tradition by naming the child Benbow Sartoris, thus uniting the placidity of her own life as a Benbow with the energy of the Sartorises. In The Sound and the Fury and Light in August, both poles of the conflict are expressed in terms of the Christian myth. The Compson narrators all have rigid perceptual frameworks which are linked with a view of Christianity as an oppressive ideology. In contrast, Dilsey's experience in the Easter service is an expression of the acceptance of the whole man which allows one to see the integrity of life and is timeless because it subsumes all of time, "de beginnin’ en de endin,'” into an instant of perception. Light in August deals with society's imposition of its definitions on individuals and Joe, like Christ, is martyred because his life is perceived as a threat to its pattern of order. Then, in the conjunction of Joe's death with the birth of Lena's baby, one sees a union of the suffering brought by "evil" and the ecstasy of creation. Both poles, nativity and crucifixion, are part of the Christian myth; both are part of life itself and when conjoined, bring a comprehension of the divinity of life experienced in its wholeness. Thus, in Faulkner's works, the Christian myth becomes, in Mark Schorer's words, "a large controlling image...which gives philosophical meaning to the facts of ordinary life." The thematic consistency with which the myth is used underscores that meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207