MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Two-years biochemical failure-free survival following high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized prostate cancer: Prospective single center study of 196 patients

2009· article· en· W2280415345 on OpenAlexaff
Jehonathan H. Pinthus, Forough Farrokhyar, Magdy Hassouna, Edward A. Woods, William Orovan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityThe Scarborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerProspective cohort studyUrologyProstateSingle CenterCancerBiopsyRadiation therapySurgeryNuclear medicineMedian follow-upInternal medicineOverall survival

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5117 Background: HIFU is an emerging ablative modality for the treatment of localized prostate cancer with limited reports on oncological outcome. We prospectively analyzed our 2-year results. Methods: 253 consecutive patients (age: 64+8) were treated with a planed single session of HIFU using the Ablatherm integrated imaging model system between January 2006 and June 2008. Patients were followed (median: 12; range 3–24 months) with PSA measurement every 3 months. Patients who received prior radiation or hormonal therapy (n=25) and patient for whom at least 2 consecutive PSA measurements were not available (n = 32) were excluded, leaving a total of 196 patients for analysis. Mean pre-treatment PSA was 6.9+3.3. Biopsy Gleason scores at diagnosis (median 9 cores) were 5, 6, 3+4, 4+3 in 1, 91, 66 and 38 patients, respectively. Biochemical failure (BCF) is reported using the Stephenson (PSA >0.4ng/ml and rising), Horwitz (2 consecutive increases of at least 0.5ng/ml) and Phoenix (nadir+2ng/ml) definitions. Results: 196 patients (age: 64+8) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. 75 had low and 121 had intermediate D'Amico's risk stratification disease. Mean and median absolute PSA nadir levels were 0.28+0.53 and 0.06 ng/ml respectively. It was achieved in median time of 3 months and remained unchanged in 70% of the patients throughout the follow-up. Overall 2 years BCF free rates were 70 % (62–78%), 86 % (81–91%) and 96% (91–99%) according to the Stephenson, Horwitz and Phoenix definitions, respectively; with no significant differences between risk groups. Predictors of BCF were absolute nadir [HR: 3.0 (2.3–3.8)] and pre-treatment PSA [HR: 1.1 (1.0–1.2)]. Conclusions: This is the only study to date that analyzed post HIFU BCF free rates according to post radical prostatectomy definition of BCF. BCF usually occur in the first year and plateau thereafter. Short term results by all BCF definitions are promising with similar results for patients with low and intermediate risk. Pre-HIFU PSA and post-HIFU PSA nadir levels are predictors for BCF. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→