Heat Transfer during Multiple Jet Impingement on the Top Surface of Hot Rolled Steel Strip
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a unique pilot facility a series of tests were conducted using three top jets to simulate the heat transfer that occurs during run‐out table (ROT) cooling. Steel samples instrumented with internal thermocouples were tested on this facility and the effect of top jet configuration (nozzle spacing of 40 to 115mm), and water flow rate (15 and 30 1/min) were quantified using moving plate samples. The multiple top jet work indicated that heat transfer across the plate width varies significantly and is high directly under the nozzle but decreases rapidly away from the nozzle in the interaction region. As cooling progresses a much larger wetted region occurs and more uniform cooling is experienced across the plate. Multiple jet cooling experiments have also confirmed that nozzle spacing does have an effect on heat transfer. This effect is predominate in the interaction region where closer nozzle spacing leads to enhanced and more uniform heat transfer in the lateral direction across the plate width away from the nozzle. As expected higher water flow rates led to higher heat transfer both under the nozzle and in the interaction region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it