MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280481990 · doi:10.4271/2005-01-0241

A Note on Premixed Flame-Turbulence Interactions

2005· article· en· W2280481990 on OpenAlexafffund
Himanshu Tyagi, David S.‐K. Ting

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulencePremixed flameMechanicsStatistical physicsCombustionPhysicsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringChemistryCombustorPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">This note focuses on the three fundamental mechanisms behind premixed flame-turbulence interactions that result in progressive acceleration of a spark-ignited flame in a turbulent environment such as that inside a spark-ignition engine cylinder. In addition, as a small step in further advancing our understanding on flame-turbulence interactions, experiments were conducted to quantify the changing turbulence parameters associated with a near-isotropic turbulent free-stream as it approaches a solid sphere in a wind tunnel.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">It has been observed in some previous studies that when a premixed combustible mixture is ignited in a turbulent environment, the turbulent flame speed / turbulence intensity ratio increases as the flame grows. Depending on the chemical and physical parameters involved, this accelerating turbulent flame may develop into a detonation wave. Over the years, three fundamental mechanisms have been postulated by different experts to explain this progressive turbulence enhancement in flame speed. 1) During the initial stages after ignition, only eddies that are smaller than the flame ball influence the flame front significantly. As the flame grows, the flame / eddy size ratio increases and consequently, increasingly larger portion of the eddying motion associated with the turbulent energy cascade becomes effective in affecting the flame front. 2) Analogous to the exponential increase of a material surface in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, proposed by Batchelor in 1952, the ongoing flame surface-turbulence interactions can lead to continuous increase in reacting flame front surface. 3) In 1995, Ashurst postulated that for a wrinkled flame, volume expansion of a portion of the reacting surface pushes the adjacent flame surface away from it. This expansion-pushing effect enhances flame front corrugation, and hence, accelerates the flame.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The characterization of near-isotropic turbulence as it approaches a sphere was conducted in a 75 cm by 75 cm wind tunnel. The turbulent free-stream was generated by a 43% solid, perforated plate having orifice holes of diameter D of 3.75 cm. The stream-wise root mean square velocity fluctuation, turbulence intensity, integral and Kolmogorov scales were deduced from instantaneous velocity measurements via a normal hot-wire anemometer. These measurements were made at 6.4 cm (2.5″) and 8.9 cm (3.5″) upstream of a 10 cm diameter (d) sphere fixed at 20D downstream of the perforated plate, at a Reynolds number based on the mean flow velocity and the diameter of the sphere of 5 x 10<sup>4</sup>.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207