MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280656826 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1556815

Development of a Model Identifying Fontan Patients at High Risk for Failed Early Extubation in the Operating Room

2015· article· en· W2280656826 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominic Cave, Qi Liu, Yutaka Yasui, Atsushi Kawaguchi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConfidence intervalPerioperativeOdds ratioLogistic regressionIntubationSurgeryFontan procedureConcomitantHypoplastic left heart syndromeAnesthesiaInternal medicineHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients at high risk for failed early extubation in the operating room (OR) following the Fontan procedure and generate a predictive model to allow improved clinical decision making. DESIGN: The success of an early-extubation strategy (extubation in the OR) was reviewed in patients aged 0 to 17 years old, undergoing the Fontan procedure between 2008 and 2011. Patients who required reintubation following primary extubation in the OR were compared with those who did not. Logistic regression with a backward variable selection was used to develop a predictive model in two stages: first, using pre-/perioperative predictors and then using postoperative predictors among the first-stage positive. SETTING: Canadian quaternary-care university children's hospital PICU. The treatment policy was changed from the routine extubation in PICU to extubation in the OR in January 2008. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients met our inclusion criteria: 8 patients required reintubation. Patients' average body weight was 14.5 kg (standard deviation [SD] 3.7), average age was 3.5 (SD 1.9) years, and average preoperative transcutaneous arterial saturation was 80.9% (SD 6.8). The first-stage predictive model contained three predictors: concomitant procedure (odds ratio [OR] >999, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.7-infinity, p < 0.001), total bypassing time (cutoff; ≥99 minutes) (OR >999, 95% CI 6.5-infinity, p < 0.001), and absence of fenestration for pre/operative variables (OR >999, 95% CI 9.5-infinity, p < 0.001). The second-stage model included chest-tube fluid loss (CTFL ≥9.9 mL/kg/first 6 h). Our sequential prediction model had net sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 77.6%. CONCLUSION: We produced a predictive model for failed early extubation in Fontan patients. The sensitivity and specificity values are in the range of clinical utility. The model should be validated with an independent sample with a larger sample size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207