MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2280935501 · doi:10.5562/cca2584

Kinetics and Mechanism of Electron Transfer Reaction of an Adipato Bridged Iron(III)-Salen Complex with Dithionite Ion in Perchloric Acid Medium

2015· article· en· W2280935501 on OpenAlexaff
P. O. Ukoha, Simeon Atiga, Oguejiofo T. Ujam, Jonnie N. Asegbeloyin, Obinna C. Okpareke, Solomon O. E. Okereke

Bibliographic record

VenueCroatica Chemica Acta · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerchloric acidChemistryKineticsElectron transferIonInorganic chemistryMechanism (biology)DithionitePhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redox kinetics of the reaction of an adipato bridged iron(III)-salen complex, [(Fe(salen))2adi] with dithionite ion, S2O4 2-, was investigated in perchloric acid at I = 0.05 mol dm -3 (NaClO4) and T = 29 1 C. Spectrophotometric titrations indicated consumption of one mole of S2O4 2-per mole of [(Fe(salen))2adi] reduced. Under pseudo-first order conditions of [S2O4 2-] above ten-fold excess of concentration of [(Fe(salen))2adi], observed rates increased with increase in [S2O4 2-] and second order rate constants were fairly constant (0.285 0.01 dm 3 mol -1 s -1 ) indicating first order dependence of the rate on [(Fe(salen))2adi]. A plot of logkobs versus log[S2O4 2-] was linear and gave a slope of 1.0 indicating first order dependence of the rate on [S2O4 2-]. The reaction rate increased with increase in [H + ] within 3 10 -3 mol dm -3 [H + ] 14 10 -3 mol dm -3 . The reaction was unaffected by variation of ionic strength and dielectric constant of the medium. Addition of anion and cation did not catalyze the reaction. The reaction has been analyzed on the basis of an inner-sphere mechanism mediated by proton transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCroatica Chemica ActaSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207