Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Children with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bladder and bowel dysfunction is a common reason for referral to pediatric urology. The role of the autonomic nervous system in the pathogenesis of bladder and bowel dysfunction has not been well investigated. We compared autonomic nervous system activity in children with bladder and bowel dysfunction to that in healthy controls. We hypothesized that children with dysfunction have a different autonomic profile as measured by parameters from spectral analysis of heart rate variability and impedance cardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 40 children, including 25 girls, with a median age of 10 years (range 5 to 18) in whom bladder and bowel dysfunction was clinically diagnosed by a validated questionnaire and 19 healthy controls, including 9 girls, with a median age of 8 years (range 5 to 16). Cardiac autonomic activity was assessed at baseline and during voiding. The primary outcome measures were the main parameters of heart rate variability, including total power and high frequency, as well as pre-ejection period and heart rate. RESULTS: Comparison of outcomes at baseline showed significantly lower total power and high frequency heart rate variability in bladder and bowel dysfunction cases (p = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Children with dysfunction also showed a significantly smaller decrease in sympathetic nervous system activity during voiding (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that compared to healthy controls children with bladder and bowel dysfunction show a different cardiac autonomic profile at rest and in response to voiding. This difference may be used in future studies to further clarify the pathophysiology of bladder and bowel dysfunction, and introduce novel treatment targets to manage the condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".