Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Biennale Internationale du Lin de Portneuf (BILP) is an artistic and cultural event spotlighting contemporary practices related to flax and linen, both technically and conceptually. It takes place in alternate years at cultural exhibition centres in the Portneuf region. Fleming was appointed as a result of a competitive International call for curator. The Biennale places creation in the center of a collective project to generate real effects in artistic, cultural, social and economic term. For this fourth iteration the organisers determined to adopt a new angle. The thematic approach Fleming submitted was judged innovative in North American applied art curation in that it moved away from qualities in the material itself and she worked with artists to research instead a common legacy closely tied to flax production, passed on by Huguenots exiled from France in the 17th century was presented. The curatorial concept: ‘Linen Diaspora’, developed Fleming’s previous curation of an exhibition at the Smithsonian Institute, Washington in 2007. An edit of that exhibition, which was funded by a Lottery Award, was shown in Kamouraska Museum to coincide with the Bienniale in 2011. Historiographic research produced a complex brief and literature review. The curatorial approach included incubating collaboration in two bodies of work. The curatorial concept did not, therefore limit to work that literally included linen. Negotiating cultural and technical differences in understanding of artisanat and craft also contributed to the field. BILP has an operating budget of around CDN $70000 in the preparation phase and CDN $225,000 in realization. With the BILP organization Fleming co-authored curatorial presentations and texts for grants to British Council and Canadian Arts Council. Fleming was additionally awarded British Council funds (CAN$2500) for a ‘COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS IN THE ARTS’ to undertake research visits in 2010. BILP is a multidisciplinary event that produces bilingual paper promotional tools. It featured 12 works by 14 creators from Canada and Ireland who are recognised for their excellence in their practice of crafts or applied arts. Articles appeared in… [list press 2009 examples- Vie des arts, in Le Sabord, in Espace Sculpture, in Le Soleil, in Le Devoir, the interviews on radio and television] Visitor number were XX [2009 example exceeded 21000 despite a slowing in tourism]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".