MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281138564 · doi:10.14288/1.0065140

Dynamic modelling and control of a paper machine headbox

2009· article· en· W2281138564 on OpenAlexaff
A. Tuladhar

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaper machineComputer scienceControl (management)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many paper mills have replaced their paper machine airpad headboxes with high speed hydraulic headboxes to increase production rate and also to improve the operational stability. However high speed hydraulic headboxes can contribute to higher Machine Direction (MD) basis weight variation. The wider bandwidth of the headbox may allow pulsations generated in the approach system to pass through it and to influence the jet velocity. This thesis is devoted to the analysis of one of such case where the replacement has resulted higher MD basis weight variation. There could be several reasons for the MD basis weight variation. The most likely sources are hydrodynamic pressure pulsations generated in the approach system and hydrodynamic disturbances produced within the headbox. A comprehensive study of the approach system has been carried out by recording pressure data from the major pieces of wet end equipment simultaneously. The thesis explains the experiments in detail highlighting the features of the sensors and data acquisition system. To study the possible generation of pulsations within the headbox^ and also to analyze the effectiveness of the headbox in suppressing pulsations from the approach system, a theoretical nonlinear dynamic model representing a typical Sym-Flo headbox has been derived. The headbox is a multivariable system, and so a multivariable Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller has been used to control the level and the total head optimally. As there are constraints that should be imposed on the inputs and outputs, LQG has drawbacks, therefore a Model Predictive Controller (MPC) is investigated to accommodate input/output constraints. The resulting controllers are simulated for various situations and results are included in the thesis. The headbox model includes the slice hp opening as one of its manipulated variables and so it is possible to simulate grade change events. From the simulation results it is quite clear that the grade change can be achieved smoothly using a multivariate controller. The decoupling effect and marked reduction in interaction among the variables are achieved through multivariate control and are illustrated through various simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207