Mechanical properties of the tracheal mucosal membrane in the rabbit. II. Morphometric analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Folding of the airway mucosal membrane provides a mechanical load that impedes airway smooth muscle contraction. Mechanical testing of rabbit tracheal mucosal membrane showed that the membrane is stiffer in the longitudinal than in the circumferential direction of the airway. To explain this difference in the mechanical properties, we studied the morphological structure of the rabbit tracheal mucosal membrane in both longitudinal and circumferential directions. The collagen fibers were found to form a random meshwork, which would not account for differences in stiffness in the longitudinal and circumferential directions. The volume fraction of the elastic fibers was measured using a point-counting technique. The orientation of the elastic fibers in the tissue samples was measured using a new method based on simple geometry and probability. The results showed that the volume fraction of the elastic fibers in the rabbit tracheal mucosal membrane was approximately 5% and that the elastic fibers were mainly oriented in the longitudinal direction. Age had no statistically significant effect on either the volume fraction or the orientation of the elastic fibers. Linear correlations were found between the steady-state stiffness and the quantity of the elastic fibers oriented in the direction of testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".