MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281383096 · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.02.001

A tribute to our friend, J. Don Read.

2016· article· en· W2281383096 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah A. Connolly, D. Stephen Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantraPleasurePsychologyTributeSense of humorPsychoanalysisMedia studiesSocial psychologyTheologySociologyArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. Don Read retired from the academy in 2015. He is a colleague, collaborator, mentor, teacher, and friend to us and to so many others. In this article, we describe Don the student, Don the professor, Don the colleague, and Don the person. For those who have not yet had the pleasure to meet him, you will learn why the mantra WWDRD (What Would Don Read Do?) aptly sums up the impact that Don has had on those fortunate enough to know him. His calm and level-headed appreciation of good work has inspired students as well as junior and senior researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Research in Memory and CognitionSame topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207