Application of texture analysis to DAT SPECT imaging: Relationship to clinical assessments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT imaging is increasingly utilized for diagnostic purposes in suspected Parkinsonian syndromes. We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate whether assessment of texture in DAT SPECT radiotracer uptake enables enhanced correlations with severity of motor and cognitive symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), with the long-term goal of enabling clinical utility of DAT SPECT imaging, beyond standard diagnostic tasks, to tracking of progression in PD. Quantitative analysis in routine DAT SPECT imaging, if performed at all, has been restricted to assessment of mean regional uptake. We applied a framework wherein textural features were extracted from the images. Notably, the framework did not require registration to a common template, and worked in the subject-native space. Image analysis included registration of SPECT images onto corresponding MRI images, automatic region-of-interest (ROI) extraction on the MRI images, followed by computation of Haralick texture features. We analyzed 141 subjects from the Parkinson's Progressive Marker Initiative (PPMI) database, including 85 PD and 56 healthy controls (HC) (baseline scans with accompanying 3 T MRI images). We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses between the quantitative metrics and different clinical measures, namely (i) the UPDRS (part III - motor) score, disease duration as measured from (ii) time of diagnosis (DD-diag.) and (iii) time of appearance of symptoms (DD-sympt.), as well as (iv) the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. For conventional mean uptake analysis in the putamen, we showed significant correlations with clinical measures only when both HC and PD were included (Pearson correlation r = − 0.74, p-value < 0.001). However, this was not significant when applied to PD subjects only (r = − 0.19, p-value = 0.084), and no such correlations were observed in the caudate. By contrast, for the PD subjects, significant correlations were observed in the caudate when including texture metrics, with (i) UPDRS (p-values < 0.01), (ii) DD-diag. (p-values < 0.001), (iii) DD-sympt (p-values < 0.05), and (iv) MoCA (p-values < 0.01), while no correlations were observed for conventional analysis (p-values = 0.94, 0.34, 0.88 and 0.96, respectively). Our results demonstrated the ability to capture valuable information using advanced texture metrics from striatal DAT SPECT, enabling significant correlations of striatal DAT binding with clinical, motor and cognitive outcomes, and suggesting that textural features hold potential as biomarkers of PD severity and progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".