MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281589603

Die Gipfeltreffen der G8 und G20 in Kanada: große Herausforderungen, geringe Erwartungen

2010· article· de· W2281589603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katharina Gnath, Claudia Schmucker

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Ende Juni 2010 finden in Kanada zwei Gipfel der Staats- und Regierungschefs statt: Am 25. und 26. Juni treffen sich die Chefs der G8-Staaten – Kanada, USA, Japan, Deutschland, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Italien und Russland – in Muskoka. Am darauffolgenden Tag versammeln sich die G201 in Toronto. Die Herausforderungen sind groß: Das G20-Treffen findet vor dem Hintergrund der anhaltenden Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise statt, die sich in den vergangenen Monaten zu einer Schuldenkrise entwickelt hat. Von beiden Gipfeln sind jedoch keine wegweisenden Entscheidungen zu erwarten, und daher ist vom Gipfelenthusiasmus der letzten Jahre nicht viel übrig geblieben." (Autorenreferat)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0100.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)Same topicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207