MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281652841 · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2015.108

3-D Volumetric Shape Abstraction from a Single 2-D Image

2015· article· en· W2281652841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstractionSearch engine indexingComputer scienceObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Invariant (physics)Set (abstract data type)Computer visionVocabularyDomain (mathematical analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)Information retrievalMathematicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel approach to recovering the qualitative 3-D part structure from a single 2-D image. We do not assume any knowledge of the objects contained in the scene, but rather assume that they are composed from a user-defined vocabulary of qualitative 3-D volumetric part categories input to the system. Given a set of 2-D part hypotheses recovered from an image, representing projections of the surfaces of the 3-D part categories, our method simultaneously selects and groups subsets of the 2-D part hypotheses into 3-D part "views", from which the shape and pose parameters of the volumetric parts are recovered. The resulting 3-D parts and their relations offer the potential for a domain-independent, viewpoint-invariant shape indexing mechanism that can help manage the complexity of recognizing an object from a large database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207