MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281653287

The Mathematics of the Channel Anamorphosis

2008· article· en· W2281653287 on OpenAlex
James L. Hunt and John Sharp

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Art History Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Channel (broadcasting)Point (geometry)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer visionImage (mathematics)AmusementSurface (topology)Computer scienceGeometryPsychologyTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An anamorphic amusement dating from the 16 and 17 century is described and discussed from a mathematical point of view. The Channel Anamorphosis displays two images which are cut into strips and arrayed on the alternate faces of long triangular prisms. The separate images are resolved when the array is viewed from one side or the other. Perspective corrections and finite-distance viewing of the images are discussed and analysed with examples. The 3-image channel anamorphosis is also briefly described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Art History StudiesFrench-language works237,207