MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281854915

Working Together: How Citizens can help prepare for the consequences of an oil spill

2014· article· en· W2281854915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marta Branch

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil spillBusinessPublic relationsInternet privacyEnvironmental planningComputer securityEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringPolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geographically situated in the heart of the Salish Sea, San Juan County is at the crossroads of shipping, from both Canada and the United States. Vessel traffic is expected to increase exponentially over the next few years as shipping, especially of fossil fuels, carries products from interior production sites to overseas markets. In light of this, the Action Agenda for San Juan County includes “major oil spills” as one of the three issues to address. As guided by the Marine Resources Committee, our approach is to be inclusive, comprehensive, and pro-active. In this panel, we bring together experts who are “on the ground” working to ensure that data, planning, and actions are coordinated among agencies, concurrent with efforts to train and include citizen volunteers in all phases of the work. Panel:• Marta C. Branch--San Juan County Marine Programs Coordinator (session organizer); Speakers: • Joanruth Bauman --SJC Derelict Vessel program: Catching the problem before it starts • Brendan Cowan –Director, San Juan County Department of Emergency Management Spills-- 101: How Local Marine Managers Can Prepare for Their Role in a Major Spill Response• Dr. Barbara Bentley--SJC MRC Chair—Creating Citizen Scientists• Dan Doty WDFW/DOE— Using the data from pre-spill studies • Dr. Ken Sebens--SJC MRC member—The San Juan County Marine Specimen Bank

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207