MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2282005703 · doi:10.21409/hal-01278228

Recommandations à l’égard d’usages pédagogiques de dispositifs humains et numériques pour favoriser la présence en formation à distance : synthèse de trois recensions systématiques

2015· preprint· fr· W2282005703 on OpenAlexaff
Matthieu Petit, Colette Deaudelin, Louis Brouillette

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afin de réfléchir aux dispositifs à mettre en place pour favoriser une présence en formation à distance, cet article fait la synthèse de recommandations issues de trois recensions systématiques d’écrits sur le sujet, principalement autour des trois catégories de présence (enseignante, cognitive et sociale) du modèle de la communauté d’apprentissage en ligne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.122
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.012
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicOnline and Blended Learning→French-language works237,207→