MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Receptor-independent, lipid dependent mechanism of Syk kinase activation in dendritic cells (134.71)

2009· article· en· W2282060429 on OpenAlexaff
Gilbert Ng, Karan Sharma, Sandra Ward, Melanie D. Desrosiers, Leslie Stephens, M. Schoel, Tonglei Li, Clifford A. Lowell, Chang‐Chun Ling, Matthias Amrein, Yan Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSykCell biologyImmune systemReceptorInflammationKinaseAntigenSignal transductionIntracellularChemistryBiologyBiochemistryImmunologyTyrosine kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The binding of antigens to professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), particularly dendritic cells (DCs), is essential for immune activation. Previously, it was shown that uric acid crystals, the causative agent of gout, were released from dying and injured cells as a "danger signal" to initiate a robust adaptive immune response. But how uric acid crystals lead to APC activation at a molecular level is unknown. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to analyze single cell activation in real time, we demonstrate that uric acid crystals directly bind cellular membranes, particularly cholesterol components, with very high affinity. Binding is dependent on intracellular Syk-kinase and PI3-kinase signaling and is independent of extracellular protein receptors. These findings suggest a mechanism that activates the immune system without specific cell surface protein receptors and presents a testable hypothesis for inflammation to materials without evolutionarily sensible receptors such as materials produced post-industrially. This research has applications in vaccine development, biomaterials, inflammation, and crystal-associated arthropathies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→