MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282067877

An electronic world : editor's comment

2007· article· fr· W2282067877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bridget Farham

Bibliographic record

VenueCME: Your SA Journal of CPD · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHealthcare Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingDaughterDroolingReferralMedicineHistoryPsychoanalysisPsychologyFamily medicinePolitical scienceLawSurgeryPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When I was working in Labrador, Canada, one of my elderly patients came back from a referral trip to the hospital in St Anthony in a very strange state. His daughter was most concerned about the apparent deterioration in his condition and brought him in to me. The old man was in his late 70s but, although suffering from a number of chronic conditions, was generally pretty well and certainly nothing like the slow, drooling person who was led into my office.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0440.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCME: Your SA Journal of CPDSame topicHealthcare Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207