Pulmonary toxicity following total body irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre (TOHCC) experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose To review the incidence of clinically significant pulmonary toxicity following total body irradiation (TBI) as a part of the conditioning regimen for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre. Methods This is a retrospective review of ALL patients who received TBI in The Ottawa Hospital Bone Marrow Transplant Program (TOH-BMT) as part of their conditioning regimen from 1991 to 2011 inclusive. The patients were treated using a locally developed translating-couch irradiation technique. We have analysed all available data for the first 100 days following TBI to determine the incidence of radiation-induced pulmonary toxicities. Results Of the total 622 patients undergoing TBI during the specified period, 88 had ALL. Median age at BMT was 30 years and the conditioning regimens varied. A total of 74 (84%) patients received 12 Gy/6 F/BID of TBI. A total of 55 (63%) patients have died, 32 (36%) within the 1st year after BMT. In the 1st year, pulmonary events were reported for 24 (27%) patients, and the follow-up notes were unavailable for seven (8%). Pulmonary toxicities were reported as the cause of death for six patients, five (6%) within the 1st year. It is estimated that the total number of deaths in the 1st year possibly attributed to radiation-induced lung injury was four (4·5%). Eight (9%) patients had symptoms suggestive of non-lethal grade 2–3 radiation-induced pneumonitis. Conclusions TBI continues to be an important component of the conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing BMT, and the incidence of radiation-induced pulmonary injury, using our technique and lung dose, is comparable to the published literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".