Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bernard Vargaftig.Que ne disent pas les paysages.Laon : La Porte, 2007. 4 euros.I 11 oet of dlip'" .ndromp.etn,",.of,", ;mm,d;.tothtllit;ng of "If P and reader into the dizzying 'thrownness' of being, as Heidegger might term it, Bernard Vargaftig neither gives us an easy ride, nor does he disappoint.For, ifhe may be said to be equally a poet of 'unknowing', with a profound sense of his own incapaciry to write into the experience of being a coherency, a firm and graspable logic, he remains that poet who ever obliges us to immerse ourselves in the honesry of an unending tussle whereby language may be felt to be ever on the cusp of seizure, yet ever slipping away from the attainment and certainry we may be, at times, tempted to credit it with providing, and knowing it to, at least, desire.'Qu'il y a de hate / Comment le consentement berce / Un nom une plongee une dispersion / Ou en moi I'horizon continue': such is a characteristic articulation of Que ne disent pas ies paysages, an articulation that disarticulates as it leads forth the content of the mind's hesitancies and intuitions, its exclamations, its queryings, its purely substantive, but unsubstantiatable statements, its openness upon its own uncontextualised declarations.But, then, what other context do we imagine there is other than that of our beingness and a language seeking to cling to it, describe it, fathom its meaning?'Que prolonge l'explosion, we read as we open this most brief and condensed of books, Eparpillement et recifs se forment / Que ne disent pas les paysages / Que I'interiorite dechire'.Shattering, resulting scatteredness, a terrestrial, more, ontic, landscape not rendered whole by some inner contemplation: hardly Novalis' broken paradise, though there is no reason to believe the observed, the lived might not have been paradisiacal, were an inner sense of boundness, unifiedness available for Vargaftig.Nor should we imagine that 'gratitude' does not exist, even freedom: but the latter, floating free, adrift as it were upon a sea of 'beance', gaping beingness, may seem more of a handicap than a blessing, provoking 'vacillement', a 'belonging repeat[ing] / The vacillation of a precipice'.Vargaftig's world often remains, yet, on its surface, one of precise presence, fragrances and birds calling across the earth's distances, but there is a nakedness, a minimalness, an ephemeralness everywhere lived, that restore to the experience of presence a silence that does not reassure.If a Pinsonian 'poethical' atmosphere hovers about Vargaftig's work, wrestling with language, unsatisfied with its offerings, seeking yet ever by means of it to attain to some relational worth with self and world, it does not thereby achieve -other than via a pure potentialiry, in the form of some residual Comptes rendus .:.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".