MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282280450 · doi:10.24102/ijes.v4i4.566

Firm Characteristics and Its Adaptive Capacity in Response to Environmental Requirements: An Empirical Study of Vietnam’s Textile and Garment SMEs

2016· article· en· W2282280450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nga Hong Nguyen, Robert J. S. Beeton, Anthony Halog

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Sustainability · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTextileBusinessEmpirical researchIndustrial organizationMaterials scienceMathematicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the relationship between the characteristics of textile and garment small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam and their adaptive capacity. A scoring method was applied to measure each firm’s adaptive capacity based on 6 criteria that measured internal capacity, strategies for adapting and the actual level of adaptation. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to test four hypotheses which were developed based on the findings of current literature. Three out of four hypotheses are supported by the analysis, which shows a positive correlation between firm size, operation type, firm age and its adaptive capacity. The ownership type does not have a statistically significant relationship with a firm’s adaptive capacity. The results are strongly supported by qualitative results and field observations. Despite a number of limitations, the study is a first contribution to the literature providing insights on the adaptive capacity of SMEs in Vietnam’s textile and garment industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environment and SustainabilitySame topicEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessFrench-language works237,207