Les croyances de futurs enseignants sur le redoublement au regard de leurs connaissances sur ses effets et de leurs conceptions psychopédagogiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette étude est d’explorer de façon quantitative l’existence, chez les futurs enseignants, de liens entre leurs croyances et connaissances sur le redoublement et leurs conceptions générales de l’enseignement. Pour ce faire, un questionnaire a été soumis à 592 étudiants inscrits en formation d’enseignant primaire à l’Université de Genève. Les résultats montrent que c’est la connaissance des recherches sur les effets du redoublement qui explique le plus la croyance en défaveur de la pratique du redoublement et inversement. Cette donnée est essentielle pour la formation initiale ou continue des enseignants, puisqu’elle témoigne de la nécessité et de l’importance des savoirs théoriques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".