MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

k-delivery traveling salesman problem on tree networks

2012· article· en· W2282607975 on OpenAlexafffund
Binay Bhattacharya, Yuzhuang Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemPickupRouting (electronic design automation)Vehicle routing problemTree (set theory)Traveling purchaser problemComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsCombinatorics2-optArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the k-delivery traveling salesman problem (TSP)on trees, a variant of the non-preemptive capacitated vehicle routing problem with pickups and deliveries. We are given n pickup locations and n delivery locations on trees, with exactly one item at each pickup location. The k-delivery TSP is to find a minimum length tour by a vehicle of finite capacity k to pick up and deliver exactly one item to each delivery location. We show that an optimal solution for the k-delivery TSP on paths can be found that allows succinct representations of the routes. By exploring the symmetry inherent in the k-delivery TSP, we design a 5/3-approximation algorithm for the k-delivery TSP on trees of arbitrary heights. The ratio can be improved to (3/2 - 1/2k) for the problem on trees of height 2. The developed algorithms are based on the following observation: under certain conditions, it makes sense for a non-empty vehicle to turn around and pick up additional loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)Same topicVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsFrench-language works237,207