MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282702992 · doi:10.17528/cifor/002347

Do trees grow on money?: the implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD

2007· book· en· W2282702992 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Kanninen, D. Murdiyarso, F. Seymour, A. Angelsen, Sven Wunder, L. German

Bibliographic record

VenueCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · 2007
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFP7 International CooperationInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DéveloppementBundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und EntwicklungSveriges LantbruksuniversitetEuropean CommissionOverseas Development InstituteInternational Development Research CentreInstitut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaInternational Tropical Timber OrganizationMargot Marsh Biodiversity FoundationNature ConservancyDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationTinker FoundationJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationCharles Stewart Mott Foundation
KeywordsDeforestation (computer science)Natural resource economicsAgroforestryBusinessEconomicsEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper has two objectives. First, it analyzes the past research on deforestation and summarizes the findings of that research, in terms of its relevance to the development of future REDD regimes. Second, it highlights areas where future research and methodological development are needed to support national and international processes on avoided deforestation and degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations193
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooksSame topicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207