The Semantic Evolution of the Latin Terms <i>domina, femina</i> and <i>mulier</i> in the Italian Language
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domici. femiiici and Diiilicrwen^terms of common usage throughout \'ar- ious stages of Latin history', which later evolved into various forms in the modern Romance languages. The derivatives can be linked closely semanti- cally with the original Latin words and concepts. Others may have taken on completely innovative meanings. Through the course of this study, which consists of an in-depth look at the Italian derivatives, we will see, for exam- ple, how the semantic possibilities of \\'ords stemming from these Latin ety- mons have expanded and widened to include references to tools, plants, animals and even cuisine. The purpose of this study is to illustrate the semantic evolution of the derivatives of the Latin terms domina, femina, and millier in literary Italian and its spoken dialects from a diachronic point of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it