Diabetes Mellitus After Liver Transplantation: Another Extrahepatic Manifestation of Hepatitis C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was higher in liver transplant recipients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV).A retrospective review of 278 recipients with HCV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and cholestatic disease (primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis) between 1986 and 1997 was performed.Pre-transplant diabetes was higher in the HCV group.Diabetes prevalence one year after transplantation was 37% in the HCV group, 15% in the HBV group and 5% in the cholestatic group.Multivariate analysis revealed HCV and pretransplantation diabetes as independent factors for PTDM at one and two years.Immunosuppression and ribavirin use, and rejection episodes were similar.Cumulative steroid dose was lower in the HCV group.Survival was similar in patients with and without post-transplant diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".