MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283129388

Impact of a mandatory physician reporting system for cardiac patients potentially unfit to drive.

2000· article· en· W2283129388 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher S. Simpson, George J. Klein, F. J. Brennan, Andrew D. Krahn, Rachel W.Y. Yee, A.C. Skanes

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLegislationHarmMedical emergencyPopulationMEDLINEPublic healthGovernment (linguistics)Christian ministryIncidence (geometry)Environmental healthOccupational safety and healthFamily medicineEmergency medicineNursingLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Sudden cardiac incapacitation of a driver may lead to the death or serious injury of passengers or bystanders. This has raised public safety concerns and has led to the creation of legislation to protect the public. Some jurisdictions in Canada and the United States have introduced mandatory physician reporting of patients who may be unfit to drive for medical reasons. The impact on motor vehicle accident (MVA)-related morbidity and mortality of mandatory physician reporting for at-risk cardiac patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of mandatory physician reporting legislation (for cardiac patients) in Ontario (population 10.3 million) on MVA-related morbidity and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Reporting data were obtained from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. Incidence and prevalence data were taken from Ontario Ministry of Health sources and from the literature (MEDLINE). Data for modelling were taken from the literature (MEDLINE) and from the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's Consensus Conference document on cardiac illness and fitness to drive. DATA EXTRACTION: Licence suspension data (correlated with medical illness) were taken directly from government documents. These were then applied to a 'risk of harm' formula used to calculate the risk posed to bystanders and passengers by the suspended patients if they had continued to drive. Canadian licence suspension guidelines were then reviewed in conjunction with cardiac disease incidence and prevalence data to arrive at the number of patients who should have been suspended. Physician compliance with the legislation was then calculated, along with the potential impact on MVA-related morbidity and mortality in the scenario of 100% physician compliance. STUDY SELECTION: All Ontario drivers who had licence suspensions in 1996 for reasons of cardiac disease were included in the analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine hundred and ninety-four licences were suspended for cardiac reasons in 1996, compared with an estimated 72,407 that should have been suspended if Canadian guidelines had been followed (1.4%). Less than one death or serious injury was avoided as a result of the legislation (from the 'risk of harm' formula). If all drivers with cardiac illness had been suspended from driving, up to 29.2 such events could potentially have been avoided. However, only 13 of 929 (1.4%) road fatalities in Ontario in 1996 were attributed to a driver with a medical illness. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory physician reporting of patients with cardiac illness has a negligible impact on MVA-related morbidity and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207