Off the Grid Tensor Completion for Seismic Data Interpolation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The practical realities of acquiring seismic data in a realistic survey are often at odds with the stringent requirements of Nyquist-based sampling theory. The unpredictable movement of the ocean’s currents can be detrimental in acquiring exactly equally-spaced samples while sampling at Nyquist-rates are expensive, given the huge dimensionality and size of the data volume. Recent work in matrix and tensor completion for seismic data interpolation aim to alleviate such stringent Nyquist-based sampling requirements but are fundamentally posed on a regularly-spaced grid. In this work, we extend our previous results in using the so-called Hierarchical Tucker (HT) tensor format for recovering seismic data to the irregularly sampled case. We introduce an interpolation operator that resamples our tensor from a regular grid (in which we impose our low-rank constraints) to our irregular sampling grid. Our framework is very flexible and efficient, depending primarily on the computational costs of this operator. We demonstrate the superiority of this approach on a realistic BG data set compared to using low-rank tensor methods that merely use binning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it