MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283346166

Социально-экономические и политические аспекты деятельности комитетов бедноты на Урале: историографический очерк

2014· article· ru· W2283346166 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Уральского государственного экономического университета · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrutinySubject (documents)Political sciencePoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic historySociologyLawHistoryLibrary scienceArchaeologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the process of researching social-economic and political aspects of the activities of the committees of the poor at the Urals in the summer and autumn of 1918 by domestic historians; the evolution of the views of researchers on the subject of study is shown; degree of scrutiny of the problem is defined. The author formulates his own conclusions about the role played by the committees of the poor in the civil confrontation in the first quarter of the XX century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it