MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283356129 · doi:10.1056/ac200803170000001

Postexposure Prophylaxis for HIV After Sexual Assault

2008· article· en· W2283356129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raphael J. Landovitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal watch · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual assaultMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Post-exposure prophylaxisFamily medicineMedical emergencyEmergency medicinePoison controlSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV is recommended by international, national, and state guidelines, but implementation among sexual assault survivors is challenging. To better identify and characterize barriers to service delivery, investigators conducted a protocol-driven pilot program at 18 sexual-assault treatment facilities in Ontario, Canada. The program was free to patients and involved risk assessment, PEP recommendation (based on source characteristics and exposure type), medication provision, and intensive medical follow-up. From September 2003 through January 2005, 1103 individuals (97% women) were evaluated for PEP eligibility after sexual assault. The 121 who presented …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal watchSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207