MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283374966 · doi:10.2495/str030361

Structural analysis of the main apse vault of St. George of Greeks Cathedral built c.1390 at Famagusta, Cyprus

2003· article· en· W2283374966 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ata Atun

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on the built environment · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreeksGeorge (robot)Vault (architecture)Ancient historyArchaeologyQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The foundation date of the Cathedral Church of St. George of the Greeks [l] can be dated with a hgh degree of probability to the end of the XIV century. This magnificent building was built on the edge of the Greek quarter, which occupied almost the whole of the southern end of the city of Farnagusta. The history says that this building was abandoned after 157 1, as it had suffered severely from the fire of the battery established by the Turks on the rock to the south-east of the harbour and the marks of cannon-balls can be seen on the walls of the apse. The building was built so strong that it could stand any kind of battering and earthquakes to a certain extent. A detailed survey was done to find out the building techque and materials used, including the quarry where the stones were cut, the chemical composition and the strength of the stones and mortar used in between. A very sophisticated structural analysis [2] was done to find out the strength of the main vault, its behavior and reactions to external forces, especially to earthquake and cannon balls. 1. Location Cathedral Church of St. George of the Greeks is situated in the south east part of the town of Famagusta on the east cost of the Cyprus island, located at the eastern part of Mediterranean sea. Its exact position is 35'07.2' N, 33'56.7' E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on the built environmentSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207