MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283428920

Designing Next-generation Implantable Wireless Telemetry

2018· article· en· W2283428920 on OpenAlex
Deyasini Majumdar, Christian Schlegel, Navid Rezaei, B.F. Cockburn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemetryWirelessBiotelemetryComputer scienceBody area networkKey (lock)Wireless networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biomedical applications in general, and health monitoring in particular, extensively involve on-body as well as implantable wireless communications devices to enable viable end-user solutions. While technologies to wirelessly transmit data from implanted devices have already been reported, they fall short of being able to support the needs of emerging next-generation biomedical applications. In order to translate state-of-the-art wireless technologies into solutions fitting body area network applications (BANs), a key challenge to overcome is the strictly limited power budget. This paper attempts to review design challenges and proposes a viable solution for wireless telemetry to meet the targets for next-generation BANs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it