MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283669622

La notion canonique de "jeunes Églises" (Canon 786) et les "moyens suffisants" pour l'exercise du ministère épiscopal

2002· article· fr· W2283669622 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Roland

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanon lawLegislationIndependence (probability theory)Code (set theory)Flexibility (engineering)Maturity (psychological)Political scienceLawChurch historySociologyTheologyPhilosophyHumanitiesClassicsHistoryComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first aim of missionary activity is to found the Church amongst peoples or groups where it has not taken root before (e. 786). It is considered co have reached its goal when these become self-sufficient or, as the Code says, are fully constituted. While favouring a legislation adapted co local customs such mentalities, Ad gentes also proposes that maturity in a young church is achieved with the presence diocesan structure , the introduction of consecrated life, such the development of the laity. But achieving sufficient means is not merely a mathematical question; it also connotes the notion of an entrenchment susceptible of bearing fruit. Historically, the Holy See granted young churches certain exemptions such privileges meant to foster a positive environment in which they could grow. Although the canonical norms of the Code of 1917 provided for considerable flexibility, there was a marked increase in the Holy See's centralized authority. In the Code of 1983, the norms pertaining to apostolic vicariates do not clearly distinguish between a young church and an older one which has not yet been established as a diocese. In the period following Vatican II Council, a church did not become mature when it was considered self-sufficient, but rather when the Congregation for the Evangelizacion of Peoples ceased to exercise direct supervision over it. The A. proposes the creation of a framework law which would take into account the limitations of churches' not yet ready for independence or old experiencing a decrease of means.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.036
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia canonicaSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207