MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283774315 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.134419

Nanosized helical magnetic domains in strongly frustrated<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Fe</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>PO</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2015· article· lv· W2283774315 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kate A. Ross, Mitchell M. Bordelon, Greg Terho, James R. Neilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyU.S. Department of CommerceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismNeutron diffractionCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsMagnetic momentMagnetizationMagnetic structureDiffractionPhysicsMaterials scienceChemistryCrystal structureMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have investigated the magnetic and structural properties of Fe3PO4O3 using various methods including thermodynamic probes, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, and neutron powder diffraction. In this context, the authors demonstrate the formation of an incommensurate helical antiferromagnetic structure with highly anisotropic domains, which may be produced through magnetoelastic strain that blocks long-range magnetic order. The overall helical nature of the magnetic domains may be of interest to those studying antiferromagnetic Skyrmions and other topological spin textures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5780.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207