MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283774315 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.134419

Nanosized helical magnetic domains in strongly frustrated<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Fe</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>PO</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2015· article· lv· W2283774315 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kate A. Ross, Mitchell M. Bordelon, Greg Terho, James R. Neilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyU.S. Department of CommerceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismNeutron diffractionCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsMagnetic momentMagnetizationMagnetic structureDiffractionPhysicsMaterials scienceChemistryCrystal structureMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have investigated the magnetic and structural properties of Fe3PO4O3 using various methods including thermodynamic probes, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, and neutron powder diffraction. In this context, the authors demonstrate the formation of an incommensurate helical antiferromagnetic structure with highly anisotropic domains, which may be produced through magnetoelastic strain that blocks long-range magnetic order. The overall helical nature of the magnetic domains may be of interest to those studying antiferromagnetic Skyrmions and other topological spin textures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207