Интродукция сосны скрученной в условиях Ленинградской области
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper studied the growth of 22-year-old Pinus contorta stands in the Leningrad Region. These trees are half-sib offsprings of five different plus trees from their native habitat (Alberta, Canada). We have carried out a comparative analysis of sowing qualities of Pinus contorta seeds at primary introduction and local species ( Pinus sylvestris ). The research resulted in some preliminary conclusions about the level of adaptation of Pinus contorta at its introduction in the Leningrad Region. Since planting and up to the second age-class, the fastest height growth was observed in Pinus contorta offsprings from Gordondale community, and the fastest diameter growth was observed in the offsprings from Swan Hills. Seed germination in introduced species varied from 23.5 to 68.7 %. The best germination results were observed in the seeds of Pinus contorta offsprings from Grovedale hamlet. The amount of empty seeds in the offsprings under study varied between 14 and 41.8 %, suggesting the need for additional seed separation before sowing and further research on the properties of Pinus contorta pollen in Northwest Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it