A pedagogical study of selected intermediate violin pieces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation provides the violin teacher with suggestions and ideas for helping private violin students acquire and develop the technical and interpretive expertise required by selected solo pieces at the intermediate level. It involves the analysis of the skills necessary for the successful performance of twelve intermediate level violin pieces selected from the syllabus of The Western Board of Music, which operates in western Canada. Intermediate level is defined by reference to five current syllabi. Most students of Junior High School and Senior High School age are at the intermediate level. The twelve selected pieces are those chosen most frequently for performance on Western Board of Music intermediate level violin examinations in the past decade. The violin syllabus of The Western Board of Music provides an appropriate resource for choosing repertoire, since it is used by the majority of violin teachers in western Canada and is available to most violin teachers.\n\nPedagogues' comments on the required skills are reviewed, and published etude material is suggested that provides practice in each skill. Short preview exercises, sixty-one in total, are provided where the published material is either inappropriate or nonexistent.\n\nThe dissertation provides appropriate pedagogical resources for the teacher of the intermediate violin student through the discussion of eighty-three examples taken from the selected pieces. Recommendations for further research and action are made. As well, the history of The Western Board of Music is summarized and its current operations are described. Appendices include required skills listed by piece, required skills contained within standard intermediate level etude material and the complete selected pieces from which examples are taken in the dissertation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".