MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283922630 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.st.o.00004

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Both-Bones Forearm Fractures*

2015· article· en· W2283922630 on OpenAlexafffund
Aaron Nauth, Michael D. McKee

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Essential Surgical Techniques · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineInternal fixationForearmReduction (mathematics)OrthodonticsSurgeryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compared with closed reduction or older fixation methods, open reduction and compression plate fixation has dramatically improved the outcomes of displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures. However, the procedure can be technically demanding, with implant choice, surgical approach, accuracy of reduction, and sufficient fracture stability to allow early postoperative motion all having been shown to affect outcome. The procedure is performed with the following steps:The patient is positioned supine on the operating room table with the arm on a hand-table and a tourniquet applied to the upper arm.After skin preparation and draping, a longitudinal incision is made over the volar aspect of the forearm between the flexor carpi radialis tendon and the radial artery, centered over the radial fracture site.The interval between the flexor carpi radialis and the radial artery is developed, and, depending on the location, the deeper musculature is reflected from the bone adjacent to the fracture site, which is debrided of hematoma, irrigated, and cleaned.The fracture is reduced and is provisionally fixed with a Kirschner wire, or lag screw if possible. A small-fragment compression plate that provides at least three bicortical screws proximal and distal to the fracture is selected and is applied with one screw each proximally and distally.After provisional fixation of the radius, a similar process is carried out for the ulna, with use of an approach along the subcutaneous border between the flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris. Then the forearm is carefully examined clinically and radiographically to ensure accurate reduction of the fractures and motion/stability of the elbow and wrist.The remainder of the screws are inserted, the fascia of the forearm is not closed, and a standard closure of subcutaneous tissue and skin is performed.Open fractures of the forearm can typically be treated with irrigation, debridement, and immediate fixation. A volar approach is preferred over a dorsal approach for most radial fractures to minimize the risk to the posterior interosseous nerve. Anatomic reduction, especially restoration of the radial bow, is critical for restoration of motion and function. Bone-grafting is rarely indicated, even in comminuted fractures. A rapid return to function, union rates of ≥95%, restoration of forearm strength and stability, and low complication rates have been reported in multiple studies of this technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJBJS Essential Surgical TechniquesSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207