Equity and the Academy: A Survey of Theatre Productions at Canadian Post-Secondary Institutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a periodic basis, reports from professional arts organizations as well as articles in the popular press scrutinize the inequitable rates of gender participation in the professional theatre landscape. But what about the school play, in particular at Canadian post-secondary institutions with drama and theatre programs? This article disseminates and analyzes empirical data about artistic programming at post-secondary institutions, with a specific focus on the gender ratio of playwrights. Nicholas Hanson and Alexa Elser collected information about mainstage theatre productions connected to forty-five English-language post-secondary institutions across Canada, spanning a period of three academic years: 2012/13, 2013/14, and 2014/15. Hanson and Elser’s research reveals that schools produce plays written by women even less frequently than professional theatres do. Arguing that a greater focus on gender equity in the academy offers the potential to implement substantive change, Hanson and Elser provide resources and recommendations to bolster the production of plays by women at post-secondary institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".