Job Satisfaction & Individual Commmitment As Mediating Variables In Relationship Between Work-Family Conflict With Turnover Intentions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The background of this research are phenomenon gap and research gap of work-family conflict which influences turnover intentions of auditors who works in publlic accounting firms Indonesia. The purpose of research is to build an extensive modeling by incorporating turnover intention through two variables, job satisfaction and individual commitment as mediating variable of relationship between work-family conflict (WFC) and turnover intentions (TI) which are predicted to reduce turnover intentions of auditors who work in public accounting firms in Indonesia to other companies or offices. This study used Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach in hypothesis testing and it was endorsed by Partial Least Square (PLS). Based on hypothesis testing with SmartPLS 2.0 M3, several conclusions were : 1) Work-family conflict did not influence significantly auditors turnover intentions. 2) Work-family conflict significantly influenced auditors individual commitment. 3) Work-family conflict did not significantly influence auditors job satisfaction. 4) Individual commitment significantly influenced auditors job satisfaction. 5) Individual commitment significantly influenced auditors turnover intentions. 6) Job satisfaction did not significantly influence auditors turnover intentions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it