MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284208038

Accompagnement au sevrage tabagique (moyens actuels, rôles du pharmacien et enquête auprès des pharmaciens d'officine de Grenoble)

2001· article· fr· W2284208038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline Perrier

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connaissant les conséquences du tabagisme sur la santé et les bénéfices de l'arrêt, les professionnels de santé, dont le pharmacien, ont le devoir de s'impliquer dans l'aide au sevrage tabagique. Après évaluation de la dépendance tabagique du candidat au sevrage, le professionnel de santé sera en mesure de lui proposer une aide adaptée. Psychothérapie de soutien et substitution nicotinique ont une efficacité reconnue dans l'aide au sevrage tabagique. Le bupropion (Zyban©) représente un nouveau moyen d'aide au sevrage tabagique. Déjà commercialisé aux États-Unis depuis 1989 comme antidépresseur et depuis 1997 dans l'aide au sevrage tabagique, ainsi qu'au Canada et dans de nombreux pays d'Europe, le bupropion, dont la mise sur le marché en France date du 17 septembre 2001, nécessite une vigilance particulière de la part des médecins et une surveillance des pharmaciens, compte tenu de son potentiel de dépendance et de ses effets indésirables. L'instauration d'un suivi est un élément capital, puisqu'il augmente le taux de réussite et permet de prévenir les rechutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207