MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284235417

Inverse-free second moment method for electrical systems with uncertain parameters: Research Articles

2005· article· en· W2284235417 on OpenAlexaff
Elhadi Shakshuki, K. Ponnambalam, J. Vlach

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverseMoment (physics)Inverse problemApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Reliability (semiconductor)Mathematical optimizationMonte Carlo methodProbabilistic logicDiagonalMoore–Penrose pseudoinverseAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineering systems are usually designed deterministically, but if there are uncertainties in parameters, an appropriate approach is to use probabilistic methods. For reliability estimation it is necessary to have at least the first two moments including means and covariances of the output variables. Most of the existing methods applied to problems involving linear systems need inverses of matrices. There are two problems with these approaches. First, for large sparse linear systems (for example, a tri-diagonal system) the inverse is fully dense. Second, the mean of the random matrix has to be non-singular. In this paper, we present a new method to automatically formulate the moment equations that aims to overcome the drawbacks of these methods and apply it on electrical networks. This method does not require an inverse and able to solve problems when the mean matrix of a system is singular. In addition, it takes advantage of both sparsity (zero elements) and deterministic coefficients. This method can be used to solve both uncorrelated and correlated cases. To demonstrate the feasibility of this method, a quantitative comparison with another existing method requiring the inverse and with Monte Carlo results is done. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and ApplicationsSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207